InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 110
Posts 26162
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/30/2004

Re: stephan129 post# 712

Thursday, 11/03/2011 7:19:54 PM

Thursday, November 03, 2011 7:19:54 PM

Post# of 974
"please be accurate. "

Oh good! I love accuracy.

You said:

So please stop making comments like it will not see a dollar with 200 million shares outstanding



I did not say CTBG had 200 million shares outstanding. I said:

---200,000,000 shares after the 1 for 300 R/S.



In the PR CTBG said:

following the reverse split of 200,000,000 shares of common stock $0.001 par value per share



First of all, that sentence makes no sense. What does "reverse split of 200,000,000 shares " mean?

A 1 for 300 R/S of 5 billion shares A/S would result in a post A/S total 17.6 million shares of common stock. They will have a post R/S O/S of 13.6 million shares. I'll admit they need some cushion in the A/S to O/S totals. But they elected to explode the A/S by a factor of 12. From 17.6 million to 200 million.

You may think that is perfectly normal, but I think pink investors will sview it with suspition and see it as huge potential for massive dilution. Keep in mind that the O/S went from 75 million in 2007 to 4.1 billion.

I looked at your posting history and see we do have something in common. In your first post on this board you called Dr Bill "skum" Here, here!

B2B

Elections Have Consequences