Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[es1]

I have to disagree with you in this case.
Everyone here has mentioned many times that the GSA needs to be killed for a million reasons. I consider that the truth. I am sure SS would like the GSA killed too.
It seems to me it would have been a much shorter road to not let the GSA live instead of "Letting it go" and try to kill it after the fact. If the vetting is a GSA killer the vetting could have been a GSA birth control. It was not.
I would like to know why a great lawyer like SS would "let it go". IMO it is either not a GSA killer or it is not as simple as "it needed to be vetted or it is dead". SS would not let them make a GSA if he could have stopped it.

I think like so many things seen here this info is mostly true but there are a couple of facts not known by the board that will let this slide under the carpet.
This reminds me of all the "If the POR fails equity is in charge" and "They cant settle a BK without a 3.1a" statements. It seems to be correct but there is a loophole somewhere that the members of this board do not know of.