InvestorsHub Logo

955

Followers 78
Posts 8052
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/20/2009

955

Re: PickStocks post# 341876

Saturday, 10/29/2011 9:37:26 PM

Saturday, October 29, 2011 9:37:26 PM

Post# of 734159
Note Item #3 bolded in letter below (link at bottom):

To:
The Honorable Judge Mary F. WalrathUnited States Bankruptcy Court824 North Market Street5th
FloorWilmington, DE 19801302-252-2929
FROM:
Jose L. Nunez, Ph.D., P.E.5523 River Oaks DriveTitusville, Florida 32780
SUBJECT:
Washington Mutual Inc., et al ? Case Number 08-12229 l• (Ni\ GL'Your Honor,I am a Washington Mutual Inc. shareholder and for approximately the last 27 months, I have been following thisBankruptcy Case. I am greatly concerned over recent events that could hurt shareholders chances for a fairsettlement. I feel strongly about this and felt it was necessary to bring them to your attention:1.) Regarding your 1/7/2011 opinion of the "Debtors" Sixth Amended "Plan", you stated at the bottom of page66, "Although equity interest holders are not likely to get a recovery, the Court is not convinced thatcontinued litigation against JPMC and/or the FDIC would change that result". In addition, in other sectionsof your opinion, you said the "Plan" was "fair and reasonable."I honestly don't know how you could make those statements. If you look at the FDIC Board of DirectorsMemo dated September 24, 2008, they state the WAMU Bank had over $400B in assets and deposits. Yet, itwas sold to JPM for a paltry $1.9B. Now in bankruptcy court, the Debtors "Plan" proposed to give Billionsmore to JPM. So in essence, the resultant of the seizure and this fair and reasonable "Plan" is equivalent toWMI, Inc. paving JPM to take the 6
th
largest bank in the United States. That's a mind-boggling fact.In addition, if you read "WMI, Inc vs. FDIC, dated 3/20/2009, Case #1:09-cv-00533," there are numerousallegations of misconduct by the FDIC. In addition, there are also emails* from John Reich/OTS to SheilaBair/FDIC (8/6/2008), questioning her on "making some discrete inquiries to determine whether there areinstitutions which would be willing to acquire it on a whole bank basis if we had to do an emergency closing,and on what terms." This was about 6 weeks before WAMU was seized. Who is to say that by doing this,the FDIC isn't responsible for creating the panic, which led to the bank run on WAMU, which ultimately ledto the seizure? In the email*, John Reich/OTS also says, "I also believe there could be a high potential forFDIC actions of the type you are contemplating to cause**
irreparable harm
to WAMU if, at any point in thenear future,
WAMU
wishes to actually** seek a buyer." Six weeks later, this proved true.Thus, I think by making the statements above, you've hurt shareholders chances of getting a fair settlement.I also believe that if the real story of what transpired before, during, and after the seizure of WAMU (including the debtors treachery in bankruptcy court) was ever presented, in a fair
and unbiased way,
tocommon everyday Americans, in a court of law, we shareholders would easily win.2.) Why isn't there an official bankruptcy court record of WMI's assets "purchased" by JPM? In addition, whyisn't there an official court record of WMI, Inc's remaining assets? How could the Debtors/JPM/FDIC submit
a settlement/reorganization "Plan" if there is no record of the assets? If there is no list of assets, how cananybody place a value on those assets? Speaking of which, where is the asset valuation assessment?It appears as though the assets are being hidden as a means to wipe out shareholders and allow the hedgefunds to take possession of WMMRC. An example of this would be the recent Tricadia motionconcerning the NOLs. Over 2 years in bankruptcy court and as far as I can recall, I don't ever rememberBrian Rosen (Weil Gotshal) mentioning them. Another example would be WMI's Monthly OperatingReport (MOR). It never changes. It's been showing roughly $8B in liabilities and $6B in assets, monthafter month. Even when WMI received billions in tax returns, that should have put assets greater thanliabilities, the MOR never changed. That's just a couple of examples. I think all of the WMI assets, beforeand after seizure, including all of the NOLs, capital gains losses, real estates, subsidiaries, investments,credit card companies, etc., should
be
listed for all to see. During the confirmation hearings, JustinNelson (Susman Godfrey) showed a chart showing potentially $33B+ in remaining estate assets. I think that was the first time I had ever seen a court record of anything, representing a listing of potential assets.

3.) Regarding your 1/7/2011 opinion of the "Debtors" Sixth Amended "Plan", you stated on Page 58, "Finally,the significant counterclaims against the Debtors raised by JPMC and the FDIC (in excess of $54 billion)add to the difficulties of collecting from them.

"Where is the evaluation of the merits of the $54B? Where those claims ever presented to the court andif so, where is the court record? In addition, the FDIC didn't lose anything by seizing the WAMU bank and JPM has reported billions and billions in profits, and even admitted publicly that a certainpercentage of those profits are from WAMU. So how can they have $54B in claims against the Debtors?Why is it you think the JPM and FDIC have such large and valid claims against the Debtors, but yet above, initem #1, you think shareholders have little chance of success in future litigation? How are you able tomake that distinction between claims?


This reminded me of something from about a year ago, when in court, Brian Rosen of Weil Gotshal saidsomething to the effect of their being $100B in claims against the estate and thus, no money for equity.Funny how as the last year evolved, the $100B in claims disappeared, but shareholders still basicallyreceived nothing. I guess that old cliché is true, the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer.In summary, the above are just a few examples of recent events that motivated me to write to you. I'veactually been very concerned for about a year. It was then when I realized the debtor had disregarded hisfiduciary duties for shareholders. I hope you will consider some of my thoughts above.

Sincerely,
o h
* http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/16/sheila-bair-fdic-chief-tr_n_540993.html *
http://dealbreaker.com/2010/04/sheila-bair-is-one-tough-cookieMnnore-182323
** Note that I corrected email spelling2


CC:
Roberta A. DeAngelisActing United States Trustee833 Chestnut StreetSuite 500Philadelphia, PA 19107Jane M. LeamyTrial AttorneyUnited States Department of JusticeOffice of the United States TrusteeJ. Caleb Boggs Federal Building844 King Street, Room 2207, Lockbox 35Wilmington, DE 19801Honorable Kevin J. Carey, Chief Judge824 North Market Street5th FloorWilmington, DE 19801Susman Godfrey LLPSusman Godfrey Esq.5
th
Floor654 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10065Susman Godfrey LLPJustin Nelson Esq.1201 Third AvenueSuite 3800Seattle, Washington 98101Weil, Gotshal & MangesBrian S. Rosen, Esq.767 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10153Washington Mutual, Inc.Charles E. Smith, Esq.925 Fourth AvenueSeattle, WA 98104Sullivan & Cromwell LLPStacy R. Friedman, Esq.125 Broad StreetNew York, NY 10004-2498DLA Piper LLPThomas R. Califano, Esq.1251 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, New York 10020


http://www.scribd.com/doc/48109943/Washington-Mutual-WMI-Response-By-Shareholder-Jose-Nunez-to-Opinion-Denying-Confirmation-of-Plan-of-Reorganization




Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News