InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 33
Posts 7053
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/04/2003

Re: rwk post# 216287

Wednesday, 10/12/2011 12:12:55 PM

Wednesday, October 12, 2011 12:12:55 PM

Post# of 249374
Hi rwk,

What you respond with is the standard model which I began with. I think most likely it is the right answer.

But here's the thing that made me wonder.

Each of the two companies which Wave has sold to has seemed to have a ratio of slightly less than one to one between seats and employees. GM has just over 200,000 people. BASF has just over 100,000. If I remember rightly, the seat-to-employee ratio was around 75-80% in each case.

Small sample, I know.

Maybe companies have on average four PCs for every five employees, at most. But I'd have thought that ratio was a bit more variable.

Thinking about this, it brought to mind the notion that Wave might just offer price discounts on ERAS for multi-seat users. Subsequently it occurs to me the question is answerable a completely different way: of course, they may negotiate big deals all sorts of ways rather than on a strict price per seat basis.

So it was just an idle question which I've managed to answer for myself just about.

I didn't get your "really?" I presume you think I was asserting that it is the case that Wave offers discounts on a user basis. But I was not.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.