InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 59
Posts 1323
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: None

Tuesday, 01/14/2003 2:07:55 PM

Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:07:55 PM

Post# of 433140
Claims comparison: MOT, ERICY, and USPTO

When I was rereading Markman last week, I summarised the claims at issue in the two cases.

In MOT, at issue were:
089/ claims 1,6-9, 11, 12, 15
863/1-6, 10
705/1
024/Excluded before trial
375/91, 133, 162,178,213 (may have been more)
391/Excluded before trial

Validated by JMOL after MOT trial and appeal
089/8, 9, 11
705/1
375/178

Revalidated by USPTO A=amended
089/2A, 3, 4A, 5A, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14A, 16-21 (new)

In ERICY, at issue are:
089/8, 11
358/9, 11
705/1
194/1, 2, 4, 7 (not limited to single base station)
420/3
450/1

PS I'm going skiing tomorrow in NM so may not post so much. JK

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News