Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[dugit69]

Rosen and Unsecured Creditors are purposing the opposite of what the Judge has ordered. Not only did the Judge rule that the parties go to mediation on the IT but also mediation on issues that remain an impediment of confirmation of any plan. Now Rosen and Unsecured Creditors say the scope should be limited to only equitable disallowance and not include any confirmation issues.

I still believe tomorrow THJMW will put them in their place. These motions are in direct conflict with what the Court has ordered.

In the Opinion (D.I. # 8612) (the “Opinion”) accompanying the Order,
the Court wrote: “the Court will direct that the parties go to mediation on this issue, as well as the issues that remain an impediment to confirmation of any plan of reorganization in this case.”(Opinion at 138-39.)

2. The scope of the mediation should be limited to equitable disallowance, and not include any confirmation issues.”[/color]