You may be telling a truthful story. I called at the time that this was going on (not the day of the picture fiasco, but later when posters were claiming the port deal was non-existent), and was told nothing of what you are saying.
Maybe I will call again and see if your story checks out, that is why I called the last time, to check on another posters story. I found out that that story was a half truth, much like I expect to find out about this story. I have had no problem admitting when I was wrong on this board in the past, and I will admit it if I am wrong this time. So If I find you are telling the truth, I will seek the whole truth here, as it seems that half truths are the best kind of fodder for these boards. Pretty believable and they even check out - to a point.
I was told by the lady at that time that she did not know about any deals with tytan, in fact she asked if it was the tractor place across the street that I was asking about. This is consistent with the e-mail Mark sent you. She mentioned nothing about telling tytan to take pictures down.
Point 8 is how I understand your story goes, and that seems far fetched given the time frame involved. Also if your story checks out (And I will find out) It does not address the issue as to why the port asked Mark to take the picture down (and I am not saying they did). Possibly because they were sick of having to take calls from us penny stock investors? That is another point I will address when I get my answer.
Your post says nothing of the deal with the port, which is the true issue at hand.
It is my understanding that there was/is an agreement between Mark and the port management that Tytan can use the port when their tractor importing grows sufficiently enough.
