InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 416
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/03/2003

Re: Learning2vest post# 114143

Tuesday, 06/21/2005 10:52:49 AM

Tuesday, June 21, 2005 10:52:49 AM

Post# of 433219
L2V, if IDCC had a 'hammer' over ERICY, why did they settle for peanuts?

IMO, ERICY did NOT cry 'uncle'. They were given a virtually free pass. It was cheaper to pay the $34 Millions than to continue the legal issues [AND no 3g deal - best outcome they - ERICY - could probably get!!]. They finally realized IDCC was not going to simply go away, so they offered just enough to have IDCC say, screw it, we can now trigger NOK, et.al. No Hammer there, IMO.


Snowblow5

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News