It still seems to me that it's very possible or probable that they are setting up or attempting to set up some future alternative motives. I'm sure they are following what is posted about them.
Read this oh claimed searchers of the truth:
You don't find truth by doing faux interviews with pinky CEO's. Verifying facts through the company and asking for "clarification" from the company is only a "fools game" and either showing the ones doing it are only an amateur at best or have alternative motives than finding any "truth".
That doesn't matter if Dane Peterson comes up with whatever paper to "clarify". Phony paper has run rampant, especially in the pinky mining business.
Information from the company is NOT REAL DD. "Holding feet to the fire" is the oldest cliché in the book for promoting something other than searching for the real "truth".
Truth isn't continuing to support a P&D company that has no verifiable facts, except for the fact that a multi million (shares or cash) effort has been spent into the pump. That kind of resources can go into any real business, being legally audited, giving "truth" to the SEC, supporting a real product and not to support "mining" shares.
The truth is that it seems like there isn't any support for their continued statements of "feeling" worthiness towards CRWV. At least they haven't come up with anything. Just trying to gain sheep by extracting "questions" from users in order to deal with the overwhelmingly indications of a scam and continued growing of the reader base.
I believe there needs to be some "truth" clarified about Abuse of Law. Are they just amateurs or are they doing dubious tactics and "abusing" the terms of real "truth".
AI
