InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 40
Posts 5535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/19/2009

Re: deafcone post# 30028

Wednesday, 09/21/2011 5:44:40 AM

Wednesday, September 21, 2011 5:44:40 AM

Post# of 37472
It was noticed.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=67254698

Also it seems, doing the pinky "soon" feature again. Four months ago on 5/20/11 it was stated:

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The company has also filed all supplemental paperwork with FNRA and CUSIP. Texas Oil and Minerals, Inc. will retain its ticker symbol, BNPD, until CUSIP assigns a new symbol in the following days.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=47770087

But today they state it was only a "few weeks ago".
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Texas Oil and Minerals would also like to issue an update regarding FINRA and the name and symbol change the company filed a few weeks ago. FINRA accepted the application and after its initial review has requested further information and documentation from the company.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=49240237

FINRA will take and "accept" paperwork, but obviously it gets quite a bit harder after that and spits it right back and tells Gouger and BNPD it isn't good enough and that they need to "accept" some more. LOL


Should be getting the real picture by now. It has been hyped up many months about "ticker change".

Even about a month ago you posted about a "deadline". Deadline came and went if anyone didn't "notice".

Finally, we have a deadline set for when it should be completed! Yesterday BNPD released this letter from the CEO, Tom Gouger, stating that the name and symbol change should be completed next week:


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=66389627

Downtrend is still intact. Expectations regarding the pps connected to any "ticker change" really should be put in the right place. Lowering those expectations might save some money as proven by what has transpired (or not transpired as the case may be).

There is a very good chance and probability of loosing even more money as expectations of BNPD "forward looking statements" don't get fulfilled and the pps sinks into the abyss of pink fluff.