InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 536
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2010

Re: Homer Simpson post# 47169

Monday, 09/12/2011 6:50:03 PM

Monday, September 12, 2011 6:50:03 PM

Post# of 59551
Homer,

The IMGG saga is so long and exhausting I tend to forget details, so maybe you can straighten me out. The theory that was kicked around here regarding MWE was they came in and gave Dean the proper plan of attack, and because they would be too expensive to actually assist with carrying this plan out, they recommended to Dean that they remove themselves from the equation so someone else could be paid to do so? Then the next step was for MWE to direct Dean to no less than 5 alternate consultants to help him see it through, because MWE charges so much, that it would be cheaper to have 5 replace them?
In my profession, that would be similar to bringing on an expert Journeyman Electrician to walk the project, help with pricing and coordination, and then not retain that expert, but call Labor Ready and hire 5 flunkies at a lesser rate, and hope that the quality of work remained, which it never does in that scenario.

Simple question for me..... If MWE was the best available, which we were all told, and their experience gave IMGG the best chance to get through the FDA process, why would you voluntarily let them leave and bring in 5 replacements to do the same job?