NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[seeker_of_value]

DrFeelGood, you raise a good point. You said

"One can be infected with H1N1 and 5 years later a new H1N1 poses a threat. What then? Use the H1N1 DRACO and it will kill all the healthy cells that survived the previous infection. Is this really a slam dunk similar to targeting only viruses?"

I have two questions:

(1) It seems to me that Draco is broad spectrum, that is it will attack all cells that are virus infected. So that means there is no H1N1 Draco, there is only one Draco. Regarding your post, Draco will kill all virus infected cells, not virus immune cells. The cells that have become immune to previous H1N1 are immune cells not cells with previous H1N1 virus. So why would Draco kill those?

(2) The question of toxicity still haunts me. Our viricides have been claimed to have no toxicity. However, I have only seen only one publication which is about the Ebola virus. That poster said that there was a small amount of toxicity to viricides. So how comfortable are you with the claim that viricides have no toxicity?

I have not posted in a few weeks. After my last series of posts I had a phone call with Dr. Seymour and now I feel much more comfortable with investing in NNVC. I have subsequently doubled my position. More or less it is NNVCs lack of money that has created the slow pace. They are now prepared to go much more rapidly. That still remains to be seen. It seems that Seymour would have already filed the IND, the only reason it is being delayed is that they have been told to be super careful since they only get one chance with this filing. Seems like a prudent thing to do, but there is a limit to being prudent. One has to go forward, you cannot be so careful that the pace become glacial. At every stage we will get only one chance to file (IND, phase 1, phase 2, phase 3, NDA etc.)

Seeker