InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 3671
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2011

Re: -G- post# 33759

Thursday, 09/01/2011 1:49:03 AM

Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:49:03 AM

Post# of 94195
Did I say it said anyone did something wrong? I thought I had said the doc said they were each CTO'd. Now that implies the AMF felt each may have done something wrong, yes, but that is not what I said.

I am tired of going back and finding the initial AMF doc over and over. If you do, then look at the line where it states, in a list of equal items, Wanderport Corp., Andrew's corp Quebec-12345xxx, their directors, officers, employees, Andrew, etc and ends in saying that they are CTO'd

I do not believe it is too big of a stretch that the AMF had sufficient concerns to move them to that action. I do not know about Canada but in the US doing such on frivolous basis would be leaving the agency expose to suite.