InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 144
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/17/2011

Re: None

Friday, 08/26/2011 12:40:49 PM

Friday, August 26, 2011 12:40:49 PM

Post# of 348891
To follow up my post, and re-iterate my earlier sentiments... This company is being quite active, PR'ing very important developments that "set the scene" if you will, and tells their story.

Here's my issue. And David, feel free to disagree. This company, (Dom, Reggie, and co.) is PR'ing what I consider to be carefully articulated and pertinent news. But that is not what is respected at this level. Dom & co. are telling their story of what is about to unfold not just for RTG but for the industry, correct? BUT, that is not taken the same way by penny investors as it would with say people who invest in Apple. People who are savvy investors understand that pink sheet stocks are severely manipulated (in general terms, not implying RTG is) and thus stay away from this marketplace. But it seems the news is more catered to the crowd that also avoids these types of investments. Not that penny investors are not intelligent, but they will not respect news about the potential as much as from a big board company. Is there any news about tailoring communications in the next phases of the awareness campaign to make them more suited for investors down here? PR'ing about the industry's potential is absolutely great, but it doesn't translate into anything for us, and not just in terms of PPS. People who look at pink sheet PR's about "potential" and "what lies ahead" will take the same 'been-there, seen-that, done-that' approach that causes the churning, etc. because no one has the patience. I think this company needs to adapt.

If you want to PR like the big boys, which is absolutely great if that's Dom's mindset (because he treats this company not as a tool to extract wealth, but as a value-producing entity), but if he wants to be taken seriously with these PR's, get out of penny land. 4 phases of awareness is great, but its going to be absolutely riddled with people who say "oh great, they PR'd again about their entrance into mobile apps/digital media marketplace/etc., another empty PR". There just aren't as many serious investors down here as up on the big boards, and I think that the PR's need to be more tailored to that. You can tell your story in a few well-written communications if need be, you don't absolutely have to drag it out over phases. I agree its crucial to identify the company's place in the industry and where that respective company and industry are headed, but its clear that what has been PR'd is NOT getting anyone more excited. It's clear that its having a null effect. Awareness doesn't equate to buying all the time, I understand that. But, if people were to connect the dots and really see the potential that RTG is trying to point out, we wouldn't still be below a 2.5MM market cap IMHO. If people cannot connect the dots with slow-moving campaigns and PR's that require too much effort (thus causing people to just say "scam" and move on) then maybe it might be better to make the campaign(s) more focused and intense. I am by no means up in arms, I still am one of the buy & hold crowd. But, at some point or another, I would assume that this campaign is designed to attract investors, which would in turn mean upward PPS movement.

On a similar note, this company is fully reporting, is uplisting a possibility? Because it just seems like continued disrepect from the very "investors" who should be looking deeper into the industries that RTG is positioned in. You can say all day that this company is undervalued (and it is), but until others see this undervaluing and thus buy in until its properly valued, you are just table-pounding to an empty room. Point is, you could be right in a hypothetical 25MM valuation of RTG, but if others dont see it, then your valuation means absolutely nothing. Period. Other people need to see the potential we see, and so far, it seems not a whole lot of people are getting it. Patience was back earlier this year, we were waiting for this. I'd like to see some adaptation from this company and its efforts. Maybe I'm just frustrated that we haven't built upon the positive trend we were seeing. I, personally, thought that more eyeballs = more buying, not a downward PPS trend back to 2.5X annual revenue.

David, I know that this concern is not what you want to see. First, it was people saying "where is the awareness campaign?", now its "how are people, who are now 'aware', not getting it?" I empathize, and its not my place to tell them how to operate, but I just thought we'd be in a better place once this started, even if it is early.