InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 665
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2011

Re: pdgood post# 42862

Monday, 08/22/2011 2:39:56 AM

Monday, August 22, 2011 2:39:56 AM

Post# of 119177
First off, any residual gas that is created by the system is either burned off in the engine or dissipates into the air. The amount of excess gas produced in the engine is minimal. As far as EPA is concerned, very little excess hydrogen that is not burned will dissipate back into the atmosphere and fuse with O2 again and when hydrogen and oxygen fuse we get what's known as H2O. Where coverage is concerned, it'll only be a matter of time, that if you have a booster/ converter whatever you want to call it, you'll receive a discount off your coverage. The President was just talking about it a few weeks back (alternative fuels and technologies). It's here now and it is happening. You might as well get used to the idea. Where accidents are concerned. Ford and other manufacturers had come up with the idea of putting a tank full of liquid hydrogen on vehicles but I think the idea was scrapped due to the inherent dangers with hydrogen in liquid form and the amounts contained in the tanks. I'm sure they are still researching other ideas. The violations and dangers that you are referring to are no more dangerous than riding around with a tank full of gasoline. Or starting and/ or operating a propane grill.