InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 3671
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2011

Re: EarnestDD post# 33289

Sunday, 08/21/2011 12:47:36 PM

Sunday, August 21, 2011 12:47:36 PM

Post# of 94153
Sure, agreed

The Sept hearing is just to present evidence and get some initial discussion.


Presumably that evidence would include the history of trade activity with the final size, as frozen, of holding as a part. No?
I am quite curious as to its total percentage of the float.

Lawyers should be in contact with the AMF now to settle any matters that are misunderstandings.
But WDRP has NO lawyer to contact the AMF through.
A misunderstanding can blow up to a Charge if other parties have lawyers and point the finger at unrepresented WDRP.


It seems somewhat worse than that to me. As I have said many times this past month now, it sounds like, without representation/challenge, then any potential charges would, if left undefended, result in a default judgement, i.e. conviction.

Whatever the outcome, just sitting there, doing nothing, appears to be, IMHO, the height of incompetence.