InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 960
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2006

Re: warcton post# 328419

Monday, 08/15/2011 12:56:44 PM

Monday, August 15, 2011 12:56:44 PM

Post# of 730759
warcton -- I don't think JMW will take, "if we would have known, we would have bought PIERS" as evidence. I believe that Fish is saying the record of who bought the PIERS and when, in connection to what else was going on behind the scenes that we did not have privy to, is the evidence. I would have to think that the judge can use some type of reasonable doubt in her rulings and think that it makes sense (what Fish is saying) and rule accordingly.

Otherwise, wouldn't every murder/rape/(add other crime here)case have to end in not guilty unless the accused basically said he/she did it? She could logic that the victim was lying, the witnesses were lying , the video was doctored, the stolen money and the murder weapon were planted, etc.

Any judge with common sense would have to be able to look at the evidence presented and determine something unethical/illegal happened and that it cannot be proven that it did not. IMO her only ruling can be to either deny POR/GSA or delay and in her delay very, very, very strongly suggest that a settlement would be wise.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News