InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,395.89
(
0.96%
)
US TECH 100
18,270.40
(
1.19%
)
Dow Jones
39,609.39
(
0.64%
)
Brent Oil
80.91
(
-0.86%
)
Bitcoin
59,402.16
(
0.07%
)
Post# of 60938
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Cougar6

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 2099
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2007

Cougar6

Re: txgolf83 post# 46078

Wednesday, 08/10/2011 7:01:22 AM

Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:01:22 AM

Post# of 60938
I believe the purpose of the motion was to retaliate for Diac's motion to exclude Markle as an expert witness even if the form of the motion was to exclude Diac's witnesses. Essentially a tit-for-tat. Markle got what he originally wanted. I see that as a win. Whether it would have been better to get Diac's witnesses and claims excluded is a different matter.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up