Mountainstar Gold Inc (fka MSX)

[Daved810]

Likely discussed already, but I just want to reiterate.

Said miner's Feb 18th's Annual Audited are filled with references to PL Chile. The Annuals distinguish between Chile and Argentina specifically.

Then poof.....gone.

The language changes on said miners Apr 28 2011 Interim Financials and is consistent with July 29 2011 interim report. Prior to, statements in interim were simply Pascualama. As of Apr 28, 2011 we see a change. On page 91 said miner writes about 'Argentine portion' of Pascualama. This is the first time I note the distinction. Now, it's in the context of the constitutionality of new legislation relative to mining near the glacier. Is this a simple and discreet method in which said miner can argue previous claims were an issue of semantics? Is this how the wild shenanigans will be glossed over?

There is NO mention of PL Chile since Annual Statements published Feb 18th.

Thoughts?