Monday, August 01, 2011 3:20:42 PM
I have assumed the multicavity approach is superior for a number of reasons, as Water Boy postulated for efficiency (switch on only 2, or all 4, or . . . as needed), for costs (smaller magnetrons are cheaper), for better mixing (the wavelength on microwave causes water molecules to spin, this must degrade into lateral and/or vibratory motion to effect temperature increase), better energy transfer (irradiate multiple smaller spaces instead of more heavily irradiate one larger space, as larger is needed to effect full absorption of the higher energy amonut), to prepare for other markets (multiple points to tap outflow water at different temperatures), and perhaps most importantly to allow for more aspects that are beyond prior art.
FEATURED SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service • Nov 7, 2024 8:48 AM
FEATURED SBC Medical Group Holdings and MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies Announce Business Alliance • Nov 7, 2024 7:00 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. (OTC: RAKR) Announces Successful Implementation of 1.6 Million Liter Per Day Wastewater Treatment Project in Iraq • RAKR • Nov 7, 2024 8:30 AM
VAYK Confirms Insider Buying at Open Market • VAYK • Nov 5, 2024 10:40 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. Announces Strategic Partnership Between Miranda Water Technologies and Fleming College • RAKR • Nov 4, 2024 12:03 PM
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 9.5% Copper at Murex Copper Project, British Columbia • NBRI • Nov 4, 2024 9:00 AM