InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 3671
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2011

Re: 2ez post# 31653

Monday, 08/01/2011 3:20:42 PM

Monday, August 01, 2011 3:20:42 PM

Post# of 94195
lol you sure that was in 96 ?

I have assumed the multicavity approach is superior for a number of reasons, as Water Boy postulated for efficiency (switch on only 2, or all 4, or . . . as needed), for costs (smaller magnetrons are cheaper), for better mixing (the wavelength on microwave causes water molecules to spin, this must degrade into lateral and/or vibratory motion to effect temperature increase), better energy transfer (irradiate multiple smaller spaces instead of more heavily irradiate one larger space, as larger is needed to effect full absorption of the higher energy amonut), to prepare for other markets (multiple points to tap outflow water at different temperatures), and perhaps most importantly to allow for more aspects that are beyond prior art.