InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 739
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/10/2010

Re: 2ez post# 31642

Monday, 08/01/2011 2:53:43 PM

Monday, August 01, 2011 2:53:43 PM

Post# of 94141
Correct. My understanding is Design 1st built the single cavity microwave water heater to verify the design principle of new heat exchanger. If my understanding is also correct, the multicavity unit should likely have higher efficiency than the single cavity at the same flow. Anyway this is my guessimate from reading their product principle.

Although Robert has not said it specifically, we can tell that the in house testing results on a single cavity unit (, which is supposed to be lower than those of multi cavity unit) were favorable. How? Robert and Design 1st recently extended the scope of their contract to the design of the rest of the productline. Believe me, they would not do that if the result was not favorable or marketable. They have been very careful on spending. As Robert said, he insisted not to publish the half baked information and let the third party lab does that for him.

At the same time, they use this single cavity model to start the UL application process. I am not clear if the third party testing was also conducted on this single cavity model or they may wait for the multi cavity prototype to be completed in coming weeks, then conduct a/another third party test on that. I guess that may be the reason the testing results have not been released. August is the big month for all these to come together.