Monday, August 01, 2011 2:53:43 PM
Although Robert has not said it specifically, we can tell that the in house testing results on a single cavity unit (, which is supposed to be lower than those of multi cavity unit) were favorable. How? Robert and Design 1st recently extended the scope of their contract to the design of the rest of the productline. Believe me, they would not do that if the result was not favorable or marketable. They have been very careful on spending. As Robert said, he insisted not to publish the half baked information and let the third party lab does that for him.
At the same time, they use this single cavity model to start the UL application process. I am not clear if the third party testing was also conducted on this single cavity model or they may wait for the multi cavity prototype to be completed in coming weeks, then conduct a/another third party test on that. I guess that may be the reason the testing results have not been released. August is the big month for all these to come together.
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM