InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 203
Posts 13788
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 10/26/2008

Re: fsshon post# 325729

Sunday, 07/31/2011 1:01:55 PM

Sunday, July 31, 2011 1:01:55 PM

Post# of 730700
fsshon, excellent summation if there was any justice involved. This Judge has not shown any evidence or proof that she has an ounce of leadership capabilities that would be needed to enforce the laws of the court/land.

I have NO DOUBTS equity will be and is in the money, but it will only be because of actions of others outside of the Judge that you already mentioned.

I will still give credit to this Judge for NOT approving the POR in total because we would not be here and equity would have already been cancelled. I cannot believe she did not approve the POR in total after destroying equity with the remainder of her POR opinion. This puzzles me to this day. If you are going to cover these criminals up in total, why the hell did she concern herself with releases? Thank God she did.

Since the Judge had a HUGE hang up on NOT approving the releases the last time, how could she bring herself to go against the Supreme Court ruling (Stern) this time? This one action alone tells me she could not approve the POR even though she badly wants to.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News