Wanderport Corp (WDRP)

[gharma]

way too much restriction confusing being posted

As I read the AMF doc the company Wanderport was restricted from making any transactions in WDRP. That was the restriction on the company (and its officers, employees, etc.). There was never any restricting of WDRP being otherwise free trading.

What I do not understand in the new letter is that it seems to be trying to say that only Andrew and other external parties are named.
No, it also names the company Wanderport.

If the company comes out of this with freely traded shares, an open and productive management, continued product development, great. I have never doubted the potential of the product. I wish I did not have to doubt the ability of this company to bring the product to life.

That letter today leaves me scratching my head. It is very self-protecting. It pretty much indicates a very narrow intended use, it names a long list of assumptions, and yet much of what it affirms appear to be assumed in that list.

If the company can clear its image there is hope, otherwise.
More effort is needed for that.