Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:32:29 PM
As I read the AMF doc the company Wanderport was restricted from making any transactions in WDRP. That was the restriction on the company (and its officers, employees, etc.). There was never any restricting of WDRP being otherwise free trading.
What I do not understand in the new letter is that it seems to be trying to say that only Andrew and other external parties are named.
No, it also names the company Wanderport.
If the company comes out of this with freely traded shares, an open and productive management, continued product development, great. I have never doubted the potential of the product. I wish I did not have to doubt the ability of this company to bring the product to life.
That letter today leaves me scratching my head. It is very self-protecting. It pretty much indicates a very narrow intended use, it names a long list of assumptions, and yet much of what it affirms appear to be assumed in that list.
If the company can clear its image there is hope, otherwise.
More effort is needed for that.
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 5 oz/ton Gold, 1.5 oz/ton Platinum, 0.5 oz/ton Palladium, and 0.5 oz/ton Rhodium at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Oct 4, 2024 9:15 AM
Basanite, Inc. Appoints Ali Manav as Interim Chief Executive Officer • BASA • Oct 3, 2024 9:15 AM
Integrated Ventures Announces Launch of MedWell Facilities, LLC and Lease Agreement with Giant Fitness Clubs • INTV • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Beyond the Horizon: Innovative Drug Combinations Offer New Hope for Alzheimer's and More • NVS • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service To Enhance Natural Rubber Industry's Ability to Report on Sustainable and Ethical Supply Chains • SMX • Oct 3, 2024 7:00 AM
Transforming Alzheimer's Treatment: Innovative Combinations to Boost Cognition • PFE • Oct 2, 2024 9:00 AM