InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 3671
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/23/2011

Re: None

Saturday, 07/23/2011 6:37:35 PM

Saturday, July 23, 2011 6:37:35 PM

Post# of 94140
Hi, New guy on the block here; well sort of, as I have lurked whenever WDRP has done its periodic deep dives. Have been with WDRP since it came out from .006 .008 land late 2009 early 2010, and been there through all the other big retracings (like last year about this time, back to below 0.01 from what was it 0.038 range? that was a long slow recovery).
Anyway, I am glad we may see company move to a more polished PR and especially see a less childish website (too bad the old shutdown was forced to be early). Totally in for seeing this to market but concerned about financing to that self-sustaining stage. I am hoping for a more professional image and attitude (can't show this, not like its unpatented or like units aren't going to be disassembled - what's with that ?) as product readies, and this may just be the catalyst.
I just wanted to thank everyone, some under changed names since my earliest visits (TK) for all the words in the occasional pop in here to reassure myself on my DD and gut on this one. Very surprised at the comment volume this time !!!
So, that's why I signed up to post, plus this:
No one seems to be taking much store in the "Wanderport Corp and its officers" being prevented from trading WDRP shares. How can they do that if it is only Andrew implicated? And for how long is this? I guess it is 0.5 yr before some of RS's shares come back out of restricted, so this doesn't affect available shares for funding cushion near-term ? Any anyway, as I think Belize pointed out, what sort of impact does a provincial CA group have over a US listed security and US corp. and its officers anyway ?
Cheers, still killing myself for hesitating on that 1.5 M ask @ 0.0305 in the last hour before the close Thursday ;-(
Thanks all, and hello