InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 202
Posts 13811
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 10/26/2008

Re: None

Saturday, 07/16/2011 4:10:41 PM

Saturday, July 16, 2011 4:10:41 PM

Post# of 732136
I changed courses on the Judge-If No Deal-G.S. POS POR 6+ denied!

I may catch some but I have thick skin so “no worries” here. I may upset some in the legal field but I am going on actions of the court and let me say FIRST, they have disgraced the U.S. Constitution and the U.S legal system, so “no worries” there either. I look at the Judge as a high ranking corporate employee and dare I give her credit for a CEO title, regrettably yes I will. With that said I have worked around one of the larger corporations in the U.S. for many years and have learned the corporate structure very well. I know how it is to be in a position in management where difficult decisions are made in areas such as finance, marketing, operations, diversity and much more. It goes without saying that not everybody is going to agree, so ones actions are very “telling” in terms of your advancement. How do you disagree for example? Do you fly off the handle, bury people, threaten people or is it done professionally? As one grows through the ranks, much should be learned, earned, respected, saved and experience taught to others as they taught you and of course groom your replacements. After this Judge has protected her so called corporate employees such as JPM/FDIC, I would think she would be VERY upset at ‘these people’ for forcing her to continue to look like a criminal who is aiding and abetting multiple crimes. This Judge has to be thinking without giving any idea to her fellow corporate employees, why have you NOT settled this with some of your stolen money as this is really starting to boil. One would have to assume she does not want to be taken down, if this should not go how they had it planned and this is two years OVER what they had planned.

I feel the this Judge is under the exact same principle although it is not suppose to be this way and none of them will agree but this Judge’s actions in this case are just too telling. So I will get to my point of why I have change my course and view on how this Judge will arrive at a decision on this so called Global Settlement. There is no question that this Judge and Rosie had been handpicked for this case. With this case almost out of TOTAL control and no REAL ending in sight other than the hope for a settlement, this Judge has serious problems in her court along with real personal problems as well. With the two new decisions such as ANICO, Stern, one or more of the Horsies filing objections, insider trading without question, assets larger than liabilities only masked by more fraud, Maxwell’s opinion on a very successful ongoing concern and much more, the river’s bottom has fallen out of this case and it is ready to explode into a full blown worldwide catastrophe with worldwide negative implications. This Judge has no other decision other than to deny unless she want to bring true devastation and worldwide attention to the real corruption that goes on in the Delaware courts. They may not want to sacrifice all of this for JPM. This Judge gave them three years, 85 billion in unjust enrichment monies so as with any abuse, one has to know when to hold them and when to fold them. This Judge will HAVE to deny the G.S. with not having to rule on difficult decisions such as jurisdiction, fair and reasonable appeal she cannot win otherwise truly exposing her totally one sided “case altering decisions.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News