We know you do DD on stock, you don't discuss business strategy, its all about stock, that's very clear to all of us on this board. However regardless of what company you look at it is not a determinant of how ECDC will handle its own access to the capital.
It is equally interesting how quickly you separated the positive of the deal between the company and shareholders. Will shareholders not benefit if the access to capital help manufacturer, close more deals, become more stable. Man you cant have your cake and eat it, on one side you scream and yell how they have no cash, on the other hand when they can access capital you want to beat it down, its not going to work. 2 weeks ago you were screaming about how the share structure is in violation of SEC rule, then they A/S, you started screaming dilution. You are not going to change any minds on this board.
ECDC does not have to sell any shares to Southbridge except for when it needs and I will assume from what I have seen so far they make good decisions and will do same with the access to capital.
If a company with no strategy or product access capital such and this then it is bad for shareholders, with ECDC the plan the strategy the product are all a matter of public record. so who is trying to fool who?
One thing is for certain stock traders never make good business people they look at the sky from the top down (is that even possible?)
