InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,487.03
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,528.80
(
0.62%
)
Dow Jones
38,834.86
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
84.66
(
-0.05%
)
Bitcoin
66,384.82
(
2.19%
)
Post# of 346917
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

starfire

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 17
Posts 4177
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/20/2004

starfire

Re: loanranger post# 335835

Monday, 07/11/2011 3:43:49 PM

Monday, July 11, 2011 3:43:49 PM

Post# of 346917
loan, your interpretation of the form 3 is one way...what dpilon was saying is that there was no form 3 filed by pike when the 100 million shares were initially bought as the company was a 1933 act co. which did not require a form 3 filing but when it did turn into a 1934 act co, which was on 28 Sep, pike was forced to file a form 3.......dpilon's statement was an FYI...I know it tickled your senses!!

by the by can you tell the dates for the buy transactions of the 100 million shares?????
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up