InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 107
Posts 12946
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 09/17/2009

Re: navycmdr post# 131355

Monday, 07/11/2011 11:16:46 AM

Monday, July 11, 2011 11:16:46 AM

Post# of 212382
I think the BK had to be a wake up call to both parties. Now, I am not saying that things will be different in the future. But with the potential of the Bio Harp technology, one would think they could find a way to make it work as far as the business plan. I would suggest they just elect a new ceo and both have limited control if trust is the issue. But that is just my opinion of one way to fix the company. But if they do come up with a fix, it needs to be a much better one than the original APA. Like you said, it did not work at all. ESA was just evidence of another fast breakdown. We need some concrete poured into the foundation of the corporation and then we can move forward. Avoid ch7 and get the Bio Harp to market. As shareholders, we look at things from a market cap stand point more than anything. But not to forget, the Bio Harp Technology has the potenitial to save lives.