InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 40
Posts 5535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/19/2009

Re: matoutus post# 25019

Tuesday, 07/05/2011 10:56:00 PM

Tuesday, July 05, 2011 10:56:00 PM

Post# of 37477
It's what he's thriving on is the point I guess and the new management chose to keep him, didn't have to. The company he keeps and cases he's involved with are quite telling IMO. Scam companies such as this one in cases such as this which by the way lost to a tune of 8.3 million dollars against who he was defending:
http://www.corp.ca.gov/ENF/pdf/g/galaxy_stipulation.pdf

Other legal battles against him for manipulation of company shares, giving money to known scam operators, consulting in failed shells but selling his shares for profit, the shareholders of the failed company didn't get it, but he thrived. Great company he keeps and thrives on. There just too much on what exactly he "thrives" on.

Says a lot for the "company" he chooses to "thrive" on now. Still not too good for shareholders IMO or for a company supposedly that needs to comply with the SEC and up listing requirements.


That is if thats the real plan, for the same old pinky up listing and then never happens BS, he probably a good choice (other than loosing millions of dollars for companies he defends, maybe it would have been more of a loss if he wasn't "thriving", not sure.)