InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 203
Posts 13791
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 10/26/2008

Re: None

Monday, 06/27/2011 5:16:17 PM

Monday, June 27, 2011 5:16:17 PM

Post# of 730828
Walrath-Did she EVER really plan to sign a POR without Equity?

Now, I know I will get much flack (except from Gibson) from posters wanting to think if this post is from an imposter, and the answer is no. I am one who looks at both sides of the coin without my head stuck in the sand and searching for the correct outcome or what form of the truth the end will bring to enhance my potential profits. With that said, I cannot get through my mind why this Judge would even consider Thoma’s objections when he stood in court and discussed the potential insider trading of the Horsies with the court. If the Judge was/is as corrupt as (sometimes) I and many other have made her out to be, then why, why would she let Thoma’s objections carry on to the point the Judge discussed them several times in her denial of the original POR? She knew the Horsies traded (or should have) when JPM accused them of it and demanded the 2019 of which the Judge never followed through on. This Judge could have VERY easily listened to Thoma and took it”under advisement” only to never be heard from again. With a Judge doing this for seventeen years, she had to know that Susman would not only seize on this opportunity but also prove if given the proper tools and so far he has been given the tools.

I have been around a very large corporation for a long time and I know many other people involved here probably have been also. With that said, then many know what the term “team player” truly means and the bottom line means you do not disrupt the process by being a opinionated and argumentative with whatever the process or discussion is. I always thought if Judge Walrath wanted to be a team player with her higher authorities, then she too would have to be less argumentative, understanding behind closed doors and to the point of whatever these higher authorities were wanting her to do at least she had to pretend she agreed with them and give rulings to show that end. I would think by now the Judge would rally have to be extremely angry (inside-not showing it) with her so called higher authorities for not taking some of the stolen loot and settling this travesty. Instead these sick, greedy, corrupt and out of control higher authorities expect the Judge to fix all of these criminals corruption to the extent of possibly destroying herself. Maybe, she let Thoma’s inside trading accusation in for one reason and that with a crime being proven, this ultimate corruption could never be approved without a settlement including Equity. I still keep going back to why the Judge let this huge piece in when she could have easily ignored this as “hearsay” and quickly moved on to other issues and this would have been totally forgotten and now look at where we are…just saying…fair and balanced-maybe!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News