CMKM Diamonds Inc. (fka CMKX)

[dia duit]

They could also have been sensible to understand that Krazy Al is krazy. Normal people grasp that instantly

Or it could have ended with the DOJ denying there was ever a "CMKX sting". The sting theory was the entire premise for Maheu's CMKX involvement according to the Xers. No sting, no trust.

To be fair, their current situation can't be solely blamed on Krazy Al Hodges. They have been brainwash and lied to for years. If Fryar's results ease their anguish somewhat, they can begin to mentally prepare themselves for next years CMKX insider trial.


http://www.justice.gov/usao/nv/victim_witness/case_updates.html

US v. John Edwards et al (CMKM)

Defendants: John Edwards, Jeffrey Turino, Urban Casavant, Nickolaj Vissokovsky, Melissa Spooner, Helen Bagley, Jeffrey Mitchell, Brian Dvorak, Ginger Gutierrez, James Kinney

Scheduled Court Hearings

A false rumor has circulated that confuses the criminal prosecution in the District of Nevada (United States v. John Edwards, et al., 2:09-CR-00132-RLH-RJJ) with a civil suit out of the Central District of California that has now been dismissed (David Anderson, et al., v. Christopher Cox, et al., 8:10 –CV-00031-JVS-MLG). There are many variations of this rumor. However, in short, the Anderson civil case is not related to the Edwards criminal case. In Anderson, the plaintiffs allege that the SEC and other agencies of the U.S. Government conducted a sting operation against “illegitimate brokers, dealers, market makers, hedge funds, and other persons and entities that had engaged in naked short selling of CMKM Diamonds Inc. stock.” Anderson Rev. First Amended Complaint, p. 17, para. 48. Essentially, the Anderson case involved allegations against an entire industry. In contrast, the superseding criminal indictment in the Edwards case charges a more clearly defined group of defendants: insiders at one company (CMKM) and people who enabled them.

Additionally, in the course of investigating and litigating the Edwards criminal case, government personnel in the District of Nevada have not encountered any evidence indicating that a government agency conducted a sting operation against naked short sellers of CMKM stock. Government personnel in the District of Nevada have also not come across any evidence of any settlement fund (much less any settlement fund with trillions of dollars) potentially available to pay possible claims of CMKM shareholders. The criminal investigation in the District of Nevada resulting in the United States v. John Edwards, et al., indictment involved no sting operation.

We hope this statement clarifies the differences between United States v. John Edwards, et al., with the facts alleged in David Anderson, et al., v. Christopher Cox, et al. The public is reminded that defendants are innocent until proven guilty. Thank you.

ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE

Status Hearing - April 4, 2012 @8:45

Trial Date - April 9, 2012 @8:30

Order To Continue (May 18, 2011)