thereby knowingly misrepresenting the company to investors
That TR might be a large part of it.
I do not recall any posts on this forum in 2009 where the masses were told: Stop discussing revenue streams to be realized from Berlin. This is just a project management company. No one believed that was the company function. The company presented itself as a biomass energy company interested in acquiring and operating as owners biomass energy facilities. Every announcement they made reinforced they were at least part owners entitled to a long term revenue stream. Then suddenly in 2010, kaplop we've sold our interest. Well yeah, but no disclosure the agreement to sell occurred in 2008. Only lately did Cate confirm it was 2008. Never in 08 did the company say they had agreed to sell their stake, with a initial milestone payment, and a subsequent final payment for their project management services to follow.
Noted is the attempt by some to divert to straws about 3rd party websites. Batosziek didn't help his cause if he indeed posted on this forum. But that was probably minor for the SEC. That's a side show issue.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.