InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,475.09
(
0.27%
)
US TECH 100
19,186.00
(
-0.47%
)
Dow Jones
39,169.52
(
0.13%
)
Brent Oil
86.97
(
0.51%
)
Bitcoin
62,631.48
(
-0.35%
)
Post# of 42706
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

fenian32

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 45
Posts 11248
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/03/2005

fenian32

Re: seeclear post# 38322

Monday, 06/13/2011 9:17:12 AM

Monday, June 13, 2011 9:17:12 AM

Post# of 42706
When this goes back to .0065 let him reverse split it. Any split before that would be a disaster for current shareholders and would crystallize the disastrous losses imposed on shareholders pre suspension.

If the company is as valuable as some here state then a 26Million Mkt Cap(4 billion O/S x .0065) should be achievable and would at least allow the shareholders to get out break-even after this 2 year saga.

Nick should be concentrating on returning shareholder value only then once a reliable consistent pps reached then do a RS, again only after a substantial share buyback and previous PPS levels reached.

Anything less than that would be a complete sell out of his shareholders for his own personal reputation.

All post here are my opinion.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up