InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
0.00%
)
US TECH 100
19,210.00
(
0.24%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
85.62
(
0.59%
)
Bitcoin
62,895.27
(
0.47%
)
Post# of 42851
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

sometimes_right

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 79
Posts 6141
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/12/2006

sometimes_right

Re: utvolsfan13 post# 34276

Saturday, 06/11/2011 4:36:32 AM

Saturday, June 11, 2011 4:36:32 AM

Post# of 42851
Perhaps WSJ article satisfies Rosen's settlement condition that the EC would provide their own further comments about "No wrongdoing by the hedge funds was proved by the investigation..."??? After all, Edgar Sargent, a lawyer representing Washington Mutual's shareholder committee is quoted in the article and it's "no Hedge Fund fault" message is being read throughout the financial industry by this article's publication... Reaching many more readers than a court filing would...

OR must the EC make an official "no Hedge Fund fault" statement in a court filing exonerating the Hedge Funds from any insider trading allegations to satisfy settlement conditions for "certain parties"???

Hipster Battles Funds

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304778304576377880810167382.html


Awarded the Air Medal from General Petraeus for "having distinguished himself by meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight."

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up