InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 2161
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/27/2004

Re: Mike2112 post# 45144

Thursday, 05/19/2005 12:30:39 AM

Thursday, May 19, 2005 12:30:39 AM

Post# of 285905
Time will tell whether the warnings were not heeded due to negligence or due to the sellers not accepting the advice of strangers.

The rule that will apply (IMO) is this one (particularly "A"):

203(a)

iii. If, prior to any loan or arrangement to loan any security for delivery, or failure to deliver, a national securities exchange, in the case of a sale effected thereon, or a national securities association, in the case of a sale not effected on an exchange, finds:

A. That such sale resulted from a mistake made in good faith;

B. That due diligence was used to ascertain that the circumstances specified in §242.200(g) existed; and

C. Either that the condition of the market at the time the mistake was discovered was such that undue hardship would result from covering the transaction by a "purchase for cash" or that the mistake was made by the seller's broker and the sale was at a permissible price under any applicable short sale price test.


http://www.law.uc.edu/CCL/regSHO/rule203.html


407,321,106,308: The TOTAL electronic shares of CMKX as of 03/04/2005. If the NSS of CMKX is not there, IT DOES NOT EXIST.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.