Ah... I understand.
I don't base my expectations for a company on anything other than documented facts, to do otherswise is imprudent at least. All we have right now is they said they would pursue reinstatement by next week, and that time has not yet passed.
As far as simply hoping they act on privately inferred actions, sure I do, but there is nothing to hold them accountable for, when it comes to such things. Seeclear has been trying to do us a favor by communicating what he hears, in an informal capacity, and as far as I'm concerned there is nothing to read-in to that. He's not speaking for the company, he's just relaying what he hears. Unfortunately the company has put us in the position where that is the majority of the information we get, but it does match events which have transpired, when looking at the larger picture. But you're reading too much into it if hearsay is all you think any of us are going on. I felt the same about this stock and company long before anyone here referred to direct conversation with Toms. I learned a long time ago that third party information is generally 1/4 True, 1/4 False, 1/4 Exaggerated, and 1/4 Down-played, so all told there's too much evidence to the contrary to say this will never trade again, or the company would go BK... just like there's little likelihood that many of us will make 'millions' on Cape. But, the truth is somewhere in between, and I believe soon to be revealed.
