I do not disagree with you.
What you say is true in general (your parphrasing of MY comment :"Victoria Duff called me personally because she doesn't want to put anything in writing" is however not reflecting what I effectively said and corrected multiple times).
However, my point is that the company must find a way to help the market validate that it's honestly trying to implement a "restart" or fresh start.
I often illustrated (see past message on the other board) that communications from the company are generally confusing by what they do not say ("we have over 100 customers, not naming a single one" as an example). The company and its IR firm must become more transparent, more complete in their communications and help the market find secondary sources of information to cross check what is written (or said) by them.
In no way do I suggest this to be a scam but there is no way to confirm that it is not and this is required considering history.
Suggesting that we should all call to hear what has already been written is almost useless and I agree with you, assuming that this is what we want it to be, totally anti-productive.
Communication, clarity, transparency, precision, ... This is what I ask for.
As for "VLVT is a SCAM" "VLVT is a SCAM" "VLVT is a SCAM" having put these dummies on ignore (I wonder why everybody is not doing it?) I haven't read that in a long time ... Thanks God...
Roger
