InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 187
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/07/2010

Re: None

Tuesday, 05/10/2011 1:17:30 PM

Tuesday, May 10, 2011 1:17:30 PM

Post# of 38056
Cornell and Mario...The Deal

Let's really have a discussion of Mario and the Cornell deal

We concede that Cornell has had it's tit in the wringer with the SEC and other deals which have brought SEC scrutiny. But YA has had to defend those deals since they bought out Cornell Some of those deals have been Draconian to say the least. However, just because of those deals YA doesn't automatically roll over on the SaviCorp deal.
It remains to be proven that SVMI is in the same category. True it was Mario who made the deal and Serge signed onto it as a major shareholder and Director of SaviCorp (formerly SaviMedia). He therefore was "in" on the deal. When a lawsuit to remove Mario ensued and settled all issues were settled. So Serge got controlling interest and his so called "Intellectual Properties" restored. The contested actions of Mario were resolved. The case was settled. How now can we say that YA is part of that deal or that the money they loaned on the terms of the Debenture are faulty? That has to be proven in court. The money was paid the money was spent by Serge and Mario. The "shell" which Mario organized was paid for and Mario was compensated for his services. That was the settlement. Serge willing made this deal and now wants to claim the debt was illegal or made with a crooked company....that remains to be proven. Because the amount is beyond Serge's budget or beyond his capacity to pay...doesn't argue that it isn't owed...it's just more than he willing to pay...that's all....we all know that Serge isn't interested in selling valves ...he's looking to make his money on the stock he holds and controls and all those in the bag with him are looking to get rich in that manner and anyone holding 144 shares...that has been his vision. The rest is window dressing.

We hold millions of shares of SVMI in our group and have very good Intel on what's going on and reliable sources of DD.

In our opinion there are third parties discussing with creditors on moving in place of the present management. But the valve is still a question of viability in the long run. It's not a "Plug & Play" device and needs to be managed from time to time to perform accurately over the long haul, in our opinion. It's very expensive and takes almost two hours with 1 and 1/2 people to install it. For those much older vehicles it seems to work fine ..but it's not improving current production vehicles to any great extent and that's why fleets are balking on loading up on these DynoValves.

Yes, several ex-employees and 144 shareholders make up the group who post as Rebelcork...there are enough for a class action suit if there need be. But why waste the money and time if YA does it for us.

If telling it like it is is "bashing" then so be it it never deters to truth coming out one way or the other.

Go figure that out!

That's our take.... Got to make some money else where ...Here's just another point of view!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.