InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 2033
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/26/2010

Re: Protector post# 63487

Friday, 05/06/2011 7:02:59 AM

Friday, May 06, 2011 7:02:59 AM

Post# of 346450
Seems like we all get to read these same long posts over and over for the last 10 years that keep saying the same things over and over and over and over. Mgmt is close, wait another six months, wait another year. Sell the stock if you don't believe. No one is disputing the science. It is the execution and if you don't believe that the business side is important than I don't know what to say. No one believes the science side should be changed, but the BOD should change. They have had their 10 years. Are we supposed to just sit back and assume mgmt is credible or do shareholders have a right for change. I guess that is why the Enron's and Sach's get away with it for so long because people have blind trust.

What negative effect would ES, Pohl and Johnson have on the company if they left? Wouldnt real professional replacements have a positive effect or a neutral at best? I say it wouldn't hurt. All imo.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News