InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 21
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/19/2011

Re: GWMAN post# 374

Friday, 05/06/2011 3:58:05 AM

Friday, May 06, 2011 3:58:05 AM

Post# of 932
If Valcent EU are so "pathetic", "old" and "ineffective", then can somebody explain why Bradford was paid a bonus of C$126,000 and given a further C$300,000 in stock options?

http://investing.businessweek.com/businessweek/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=60446662&ticker=VCTZF:US&previousCapId=54743747&previousTitle=valcent%20products%20(eu)%20limited

Fane, Ng and Institute B may well be "leading the marketing and sales" based in Canada but what do they have to sell? A product that has so far failed to attract a single, real commercial buyer so far?

Perhaps Fane, Ng and Co should have paid more attention to the UK team that actually successfully delivered the worlds first vertical growing system at Paignton Zoo in the UK.

Shareholders deserve better from the company that has mamaged to waste so much of their invested funds and yet actually delivered nothing to date. Valcent management - wake up and manage!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.