InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[spider69]

mschere....that sounds matter of factly to me....what IF a named company DOES NOT sign a 3G contract based on the possibilty that IDCC failed in 2G arbitration? That MIGHT set an even stronger precedent to fight and litigate with IDCC on 3G IPR? I know I may be playing a little devils advocate here but I guess I am asking you is it possible that if we have an outright downer in the NOK arbitration might that named Company decide to roll their dice in court also, thus squeezing our NOK and others 3G deal? thanks for any input that any might offer on this REVISION---thanks L2V...you sort of answered this while I was typing my orginal post

Nokia will pay IDCC for their 3G sales as per their 1999 License THROUGH 2006..when a named Company signs with IDCC for 3G..IDCC currently has over 4,000 Patents..and when 2007 arrives they may well have 6,000 Patents, of which only some claims have to be Infringed by Nokia's 2007 Products..The Delaware Litigation will have faded away .at that point in time..