InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 66
Posts 1920
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/14/2001

Re: None

Wednesday, 04/06/2011 6:23:37 PM

Wednesday, April 06, 2011 6:23:37 PM

Post# of 732
This is what I think is going on here: Euoko was a legit public entity – end of year, they just didn’t want to wanted to go through all the public disclosure stuff anymore and went private, so quietly went along doing that through a RM, changing name to Dermaxar at which point the CEO decided to make up a buyout PR through a company he himself created (Tatler). At the same time, someone faked an account at PRWEB using Fiona’s name as an identity (perhaps it was Brandon himself??), but likely had a different email to identify it as a separate account. Interestingly enough, that fake PR didn’t say Euoko Inc like the others, it just said Euoko. Dude on ihub discovers this fake PR finally yesterday and posts it, and of course it then spreads like wildfire. IR gets tons of calls, Fiona is swamped and gets pissed off, forces Brandon to fix the problem today.

Wild…far fetched, yes, but its probably pretty damn close in the wild wild west of pinks…..

What I’d be curious about though is Euoko and Fiona’s involvement here – are they totally innocent? If so, why was she still representing the public entity Dermaxar when she swore to me she had no idea what I was talking about when I mentioned that company name? Is it possible she was in on it unbenownst to the rest of Euoko? Food for thought.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.