EFuel EFN Corp (EFLN)

[doggone]

I don't think location is the issue, but the value of the trees. If you familiar then you know the suiggested value is a farce. You know that pulp wood is cheaper than saw timber. you know that saw timber is cheaper than poles and you know that transmityion poles (18" diameter and 100' tall) command the best price. If you know timber you know that 'transmition' sizes are few and far between. for the trees in the pr to be the value suggested they would all have to be that size.
Again, i know who talk to, how to talk and which questions to ask. i have done so and posted my findings here. so, i fail to understand your comment on that subject. perhaps you haven't read my prior posts? However, i do appreciate that you agree it is the proper method of discovery for all concerned.
Folks, please take the time to explore your options. Google timber companies ask questions. Tree size matters.
Oh and BTW goo, wouldn;t you agree that even down here in the south where we grew up under pine trees, we are not so backward we would sell property in 2005 for 175k that is today being valued by EFLN to shareholders at 3.5 million?
Also what do you make of the fact I was told by a timber company rep that they had just purchased 100 acres odf some of the best timber jhe had seen in a long time for 287K? (timber not land)
Dog, on post #15
account closed for the day!