InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 1571
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/19/2010

Re: rjviking post# 56582

Friday, 04/01/2011 12:51:17 PM

Friday, April 01, 2011 12:51:17 PM

Post# of 59722
Was a general comment - not specifically referencing the lawsuit total amount - but given the past lack of any dollar detail - you expect VCTY to formally file on pinksheets or detail in an official PR the total amount expense allocated to this lawsuit? On the Q1 financials as an expense maybe? That would be appropriate.

The point was... if $155,000 is not the final lawsuit expense to VCTY - why would they not detail that to shareholders.

Point taken - the facts are the facts - if the facts about VCTY are negative - so be it. You know just as well as I do that until the false reduction of the OS that I defended this stock every single day. Then they never addressed it beyond - oops we made a mistake without any explanation and maxed out the OS/AS... then they failed to detail any dollar information about the sale of ASCC shortly as promised... and on and on...

Just because one wants the stock to do well does not mean that the facts need to be ignored. Let's see VCTY keep it's promise of increasing the share price -they promised this same thing last year and earlier this year with their reverse boost and it has done nothing but go down. Just saying - a fool is one who believes a company that has failed to keep it's promises/grand merger completion etc.. over and over again.