Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[FORTY-8]

I'm a cynic, so I tend to view the world a little differently then others. I look at it this way: you had several disparate parties (SG/EC, TPS, and Black Horse), each having their own agenda, who ALL then decide on a course of NON-action, at the same time. How coincidental is that? How often does that happen? How often has it happened in this case, in the past? What could possibly motivate ALL of them, at the same time, and on the same set of issues, to decide NOT to do something that was very important to them only 3 days ago?

And as to my comment about the $60,000 bill for February, I simply noted that it seemed to be absuredly low in light of the fact that the SG was/is facing (1) the appeal; (2) the insider trading issue; (3) contesting the DS (until they decided not to); and (4) getting ready for the confirmation hearing. I would have assumed a 6-figure billing statement be more appropriate than a $60,000 one. Indeed, a full 50% of the billable time recorded therein was attributable to just two associates, one of which bought a $5.81 meal because he "worked late". ONE associate worked late, ONE time? Does that sound that the actions of a non-bankruptcy lawfirm that's gearing up for a titanic struggle against the world's premier bankruptcy powerhouse with billions of dollars hanging in the balance? Does that make sense to you?