oh, Weby?!... Trusted Computing requires LaGrande
LaGrande includes Wave
MSFT requires 1.2
when, and only WHEN ALL THREE (3) OF THOSE STATEMENTS use the verb "requires", will Wave's future be cemented.
That, sir, is what you apparently "don't get".
Unquestionably, "The hockey stick is in play."
Howvever, sir Weby, point us to one (1) irrefutable peice of evidence that Wave has imminent contracts and licensing fee payments in store.
call me doubting thomas -- or whatever else you may prefer -- but, it continues to be hilarious: the absolute certainty of wave's success bandied about here... and, yet NARY EVEN ONE (1) MAJOR PLAYER KNOCKING ON WAVE'S DOOR ASKING FOR A PEICE OF THE IMMINENT TIDAL-WAVE OF REVENUE (i.e., strategic investment, co-development contracts... anything with dollars explicited committed to Wave)...
no, sir Weby, you're absolutely right, "[you] don't get it" -- because the simple act remains: the hugely brewing trusted-client, TPM world is in progress and, yet, none of the major TCG players have offered any assistance to Wave, but for a nod to Brain Berger getting the TCG marketing position (somewhat belatedly)... WAVE'S LEFT TO IT'S OWN DEVICES... if only i listened to a friend of mine at intel 6 years ago -- he said: What are Wave's prospects for revenues?.... HINDSIGHT'S 20/20!... AND I ASK ANYONE HERE PROVIDE GUIDANCE AS TO WHAT WAVE'S PROSPECTS ARE NOW VERSUS 6 YEARS AGO?
