Question for lawyers amongst us. The fact that Starr used MW and Citron as their supporting evidence of F----, does that create a better case for a lawsuit by CCME against them. Trying to figure why Starr played up those obvious pieces of crap unless it would benefit someone. Any credence to this.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.