InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 212
Posts 7861
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/03/2005

Re: mike306oh post# 236

Friday, 04/22/2005 7:56:54 AM

Friday, April 22, 2005 7:56:54 AM

Post# of 17378
MOBL Valuation

Just for the sake of a discussion, let's take as an example 2 stocks that have very low/very high "valuation numbers," in a similar sector: MOBL @ NEOM

What do we know from the last reported fillings:

MOBL:

Net sales: $17.1MM/last Q, and estimated:
$24.5MM to $25MM this Q
Gross Profit: $8.5MM last Q
Net Profit: -3MM, last Q, expected positive
next Q
# of shares: 349MM (Source Market Watch)
Market Cap: $52.22MM
PPS: $0.16
Proven increasing Q after Q revenue for the last 4 q's.

NEOM

Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=NEOM.OB

Net sales: $0.4M, last Q, $1.7MM/year 2004
Gross Profit: $67K, last Q
Net Profit: -1.7MM, last Q
# of shares: 437MM (Source Market Watch)
Market Cap: $217MM
PPS: $0.5
Decreasing Year after Year revenue; last 4 Q's, stationary.


Valuation Number:

For growth OTC:BB stocks that are not yet EPS positive, the following formula applies:

PPS = (GR/Ns) x Vn,

or Vn = (PPS x Ns)/GR

where:

GR = gross revenue/year
Ns = number of shares
PPS = price/share
Vn = valuation number (the higher the expectations, the lower the number of OS's, and the higher the proven expected revenue/year, etc, the higher the Vn).

For growth stocks, Vn usually varies between 2 to up to 50, although I saw as high as 100 for short periods of time (depending on many factors, including: management quality, sector value, potential future position of stock within the sector, growth expectations, number of shares - the larger the OS, the smaller the VN etc, etc).


Using the last (known) #-s:

VN for MOBL: 0.82 The calculation assumed a conservative value of an expected revenue/year of only $17MM/Q x 4Q's (number already proven last Q). For a company like MOBL (that already has shown an explosive growth over the last 4 Q's, and the increase in revenue is expected to continue, and with an expected EPS positive this Q, this should be at least 2, which at this point will translate into a PPS minimum of (2/0.82)x.16 = $0.39.

VN for NEOM: 128. This has assumed the last proven revenue (the combined last 4 Q's revenue) of $1.7MM. For any company, a Vn of over 100 is not sustainable under present financial situation, # of shares, and PPS. Simply put it, for a company that has not yet proven a revenue growth patern, this is way too high. In fact, until NEOM proves a pattern of increased revenue for at least several Q's, although the expectations are very high, a Vn > 50 is not sustainable, IMO. This will put the maximum sustainable PPS (for the near future) to: (50/128)x0.5 = 0.195.

PS: The above is, of course, JIMHO. Do your own DD, and do it well.

Mike
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.