CBA Florida Inc. (fka CBAI)

[MrLong]

Agent, Plan C: "We’ll use the interim proposal ((Plan B AS 250m vote)) to execute our goals, drive our valuation, and evaluate our options once completed."

500:1 with greater dilution was Plan A.

I found a response to a question you asked me yesterday... CEO states "full steam ahead" for "an incredible amount of deal flow, organic growth and diversification of revenue streams". So why the need for RS and AS with an incredible amount of deal flow existing?

Matt: We listened to our shareholders over the last three weeks. We recognize how deeply invested and emotionally tied they are to CBAI’s success. Our shareholders understand our growth strategy for the most part, and they want to be part of it. We felt it in the best interest for both the shareholders and CBAI to take this smaller measure as opposed to the one originally proposed.

>>>Do we understand the growth strategy?

Tom A: CBAI is reducing its proposed authorized pro-rata by half? Why did management decide to lower it?

Matt: Same reason as above. We can still accomplish the tasks currently in front of us with the adjustment.

Tom A: How about the tasks a couple of years down the road?

Matt: We’ll cross that bridge when we come to it. We’re focused on the here and now. We have a great vision for CBAI’s future, but if there is one thing time has taught us, is that making a prediction for years down the road is extremely difficult. Things change quickly in this young and ever growing industry. We love that dynamic, and we’ll continue to put CBAI in position to act quickly. If it requires capitalization decisions, we’ll make them at that time.

Tom A: You mentioned in your video, that capitalization and stock price were inhibitors to bring in new investors to CBAI, and the reasoning to do the original split. How does the new proposal affect this?

Matt: Don’t know. Don’t think it will affect the original goal. Time will tell. That said we got a great group of core shareholders that have supported us for quite some time. We feel a smaller more measured approach will invite more investors to look at our stock, as the original intent, while maintaining the relationship with our current shareholders.

Tom A: You mentioned in your video your desire to go to a higher exchange. Does this new proposal change that desire?

Matt: Not at all. We’ll seek out the solution over the next few months. Time gives us more options to explore. We’re determined to execute our business plan as we have stated regularly. We’ll use the interim proposal to execute our goals, drive our valuation, and evaluate our options once completed.

Tom A: You mentioned in your video that the original proposed split would provide larger deal opportunities. How does that change?

Matt: Not sure. We’ll concern ourselves with what’s in front of us now, which is an incredible amount of deal flow, organic growth and diversification of revenue streams.

>>>Does that sound like BROKE going forward OR OPPORTUNITY AHEAD? Why would anyone vote for a RS and AS?

Tom A: I believe the current shareholders will see this as a positive development. Do you have any other comments on the announcement?

>>>Not yet.

Matt: Yes, it’s full speed ahead.
http://inboundmarketingpr.com/clients/cord-blood-america/