InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 48
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/08/2008

Re: TheLaserGuy post# 39162

Thursday, 03/17/2011 7:50:22 AM

Thursday, March 17, 2011 7:50:22 AM

Post# of 47790
I have a question for you Laser. Are you glad you "gave" Jack the company so that he could "set up an offshore corporation" and "make off with all the goods"????? All you do is question Jack, but yet you put him there. Don't get me wrong I think Jack is the worst CEO we've had and that puts him at lower than low.

I know you got the ball rolling before and would like to get it rolling again to replace the BOD, CEO etc. My concern is where would the ball roll this time and at what expense?

Before all you bash me for bashing Laser, stop and think, this is a valid question given the past shareholder initiative.

My other concern is where Scott fits in with this new coup. I invested because of him and the technology and I would like for him to be on board for this new "takeover". My concern is that apparently he does not want to work with Laser. (per some posts on this board) So why would we want to get behind someone that Scott does not want to work with, when Scott is the sole reason Exobox even exists?

Of course so that this post does not get deleted, all of this is IMHO.